![]() ![]() also took a lot of enjoyment from me, because I couldn't believe in an believable ending anymore.Elephants have them. i loved the gta 5 torture scene, because its fitting, even though its similary stressing and uncomfortable. Its not just egoistic behavior, its a depiction of a condition, that can't be "unlearned" or "fixed". If they're supposed to be high end psychopaths the behaviour is depicted correctly, but invalidates the main story of the game, because people like this clearly shouldn't be guardians of a minor and can't love whatsoever. If they're not psychopaths this behaviour is highly unrealistic parent behaviour and the result of bad writing. they think its a GREAT idea to make their daughter cry, they don't question it for hours even when encountering opposition, they lie about it, they continue the act in front of the begging, squealing victim, they continue even though the victim begs them to work on the solution together instead, they continue even though they clearly finally recognize they are doing a wrong thing at the pinnacle of the act ("this is horrible!"), but then feel nothing when their only daughter bursts out in tears and instead laugh of joy and literally bath in the tears of their child. they seem to be off the scale psychopaths. #It takes two elephant how to#it basically states that the parents didn't just forgot how to love, it means that they are fundamentally not able to feel empathy. The scene destroys the whole story for me. They brutally murder and destroy their kid's favorite toy, reduce her to tears, and don't give a fuck about it, and neither does the plot of the game. They pay lip service to feeling bad about it, but they're soon swept up by the book to keep the plot moving. Now all of this isn't necessarily an issue, if the story addressed this. ![]() Their daughter is crying in front of them, and after seeing that the tears don't work, they're still more concerned about themselves. On top of that, they don't acknowledge it. If it was supposed to be funny, I don't think it was framed or directed properly to convey any sense of comedy. ![]() And they decide to take her cry by destroying her favorite toy! A toy that is not only now alive but is crying, screaming, and begging for it's life. They were 100% willing to do whatever it takes to make their child cry without even knowing it would work. This decision made it feel like these parents forgot they're parents. The book doesn't tell them this is what they need or should do. They decide on their own they need their daughter's tears, and they decide the way to get them is to kill Cutie. The problem with this scene is that it's all the parent's idea. The scene with the elephant was equivalent to prisoner torture at Guantanamo bay and I dislike all media that makes me semi uncomfortable. This is probably the worst discussion I’ve had on Reddit.ĮDIT2: someone stated they do not like my edit because it’s too much about me and my feelings. It starts with being two people self-centered in their purposes they forget about the impact they’d have on their daughter with a divorce.Īnd the article mentions it but yeah, there is a LOT of the characters feeling awful about the scene but having to do it for the chance it might make them real again.ĮDIT: I think the replies are convinced that Cody and May should have stayed toys forever instead of hurting their daughter’s feelings one time. The whole premise of the story is that Cody and May have forgotten what made them a couple and their love for their daughter. Even if you don’t find it funny, the end result is you push a stuffed elephant to the floor and tear off a leg. When I played through it, it’s hilariously dark. ![]() I absolutely love this scene and it drives me nuts the amount of people missing the entire ideas behind it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |